The controversial of administrative reform and its priority in health insurance? 
Tracking the trends and movement of administrative reform in health insurance, the percepter of health insurance senses that there is a major administrative flaw at the level of health insurance leaders that prevented the realization of the expected aspirations of workers and also by the power to declare freedom and change in health insurance, through the inability of leaders to prepare and implement Administrative plans are in line with the scientific and methodological requirements and administrative rationalization, although the available capabilities and capabilities are appropriate to achieve much better results in terms of administrative performance. Whereas, the administrative indicators indicate the inability of health insurance to manage human resources with the desired efficiency.Likewise, the organizational structure is not subject to adjustment by the leadership or review by the administrative and legislative authorities except within narrow limits, which led to the spread of the phenomenon of administrative injustice without there being real and comprehensive treatment by the leaders of health insurance. As for these unfair amendments made to some cadres working in the health insurance system, if all employees in the presidency and branches must move on to respond to grievances against some employees, intervention must be made in order to quickly intervene to find appropriate and adequate solutions to study and diagnose administrative problems within the health insurance.Some of my writings have indicated in more than one article that the administrative problems that hinder the organizational structure of health insurance must be addressed in order to keep pace with the requirements of the change in health insurance. Administration deficiency is one of the most important obstacles to the process of health insurance that negatively affects both the presidency and the branches in the states without As an exception, we must start with the utmost speed by conducting studies to change this reality for the better by developing administrative systems and their structures, raising the efficiency of administrative and professional cadres, ending the state of abuse and indifference, resisting change and evading the amendment of the organizational structure and functions And the occupants of the job descriptions.I have also repeatedly stated that these articles are not intended to cure or result from old deposits, but rather to correct the course, and if we are outside this system to answer some of the subsequent grievances in some categories of injustice, it is the result of a lack of clarity about the organizational structure, job titles, and specifications of occupants of some jobs.And I see that administrative reform can only be done by placing the right person in the right place and according to the specialization and cumulative experiences if it does not make sense in any way that he be the director of insurance coverage and planning and the director of branches and such research and also the director of state affairs from medical specialties What knowledge and what is the logic of this. And I indicated that the reform process should take place - Amending the organizational structure of health insurance and taking into account justice in the distribution of jobs and job grades for all employees - Amending many decrees, laws and regulations aimed at simplifying procedures and avoiding red tape and bureaucracy. - Amending laws and financial incentives before in order to correct them to become more fair among all employees in the presidency and states.